Obama: Assad, Sad Story

By Bob Mack.

Left in the mottled pink hands of today’s Democrats, any bad situation can be made infinitely worse. Pick a current affair, any one at all, from the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli, and you will invariably find Democrats on the wrong side of it. This kind of steely incompetence is rarely ever found in nature, primarily because the creatures which possessed it are all extinct.

Barack Obama, however, is not your garden variety incompetent. He is a man who actively sides with Marxists and malcontents at home and with the Muslim Brotherhood abroad — the very people that any objective American would readily identify as enemies of the state; people, for example, like Shaykh Hamza Yusuf, featured speaker at the convention of the Islamic Society of North America, an MB front group of which Obama recently said: “My administration is proud to be your partner.”

Proud to partner up with anti-American rabble like Hamza Yusef? A person who called the United States “a country that has little to be proud of in its past and less to be proud of in the present”; a person who proudly proclaims, “I became Muslim in part because I did not believe in the false gods of this society whether we call them Jesus or democracy or the Bill of Rights.”

The Egyptians, recently freed from the oppressive yoke of Mohammad Morsi, a Brotherhood stooge whose return to power Barack Obama has worked diligently to achieve, believe they know why: because Obama himself is a secret Muslim Brotherhood member. Well, no one here has seen evidence for that allegation just yet; but if motive can be discerned from action (and both crime scene investigators and professional hairdressers believe it can), then the President of the United States is both a Muslim and a homosexual communist.

“Obama would rather cultivate the worldwide ‘gay’ constituency than work with me to solve Syria.” — Vladimir Putin

Putin, of course, is no friend to the U.S., but he does possess on occasion the virtue of speaking his mind …

“Let’s stop trying to bring democracy to barbarians. Instead, let’s bring them the only thing they understand–force. Let’s all of us–Moscow, Washington, London, Paris, Brussels, Jerusalem, Lagos, Addis Ababa, Beijing, New Delhi–come together in a new Holy Alliance, similar to that which kept Europe safe from radicalism in the early 19th century. Let’s join one another to crush the unholy, unruly, jihadi Muslims. The good Muslims will thank us for it. And if they don’t–too bad.”

… something his counterpart in Washington usually lacks: 

[…] most oddly, despite having the attention of the nation on the eve of 9/11, Obama never bothered to mention either the devastating terrorist attacks from twelve years ago or the sacking of the Benghazi consulate on the previous anniversary, which took place on Obama’s watch. The closest that Obama came to either was a mention of al-Qaeda which argued that it would benefit most if we didn’t attack Assad, who’s currently fighting their affiliates in Syria, and an argument that the majority of Assad’s opponents are peaceful moderates … Did Obama offer any evidence of these assertions? Not at all, although plenty of evidence exists to cast serious doubt on them. (Hot Air)

As Lloyd Marcus observes:

“To put this crazy scenario into perspective, imagine the KKK and the Aryan Nation fighting each other. The KKK gases the Aryan Nation. The NAACP joins the Aryan Nation in attacking the KKK for using an immoral weapon.”

So is this administration run by Monty Python and the 4 Marx Brothers plus Karl? Or by the Islamic versions of Benedict Arnold and Don Corleone?  The smart money says it’s 50-50.

Bob Mack blogs at Be Sure You’re RIGHT, Then Go Ahead.

6 Responses to Obama: Assad, Sad Story

  1. I know Putin is no friend of the US but I did enjoy the flip off he gave Obama. I know that is sad to say.

    Like

  2. It’s a little scary when Putin acts “presidential” and Teh Won acts all prissy. What have we wrought?

    Like

%d bloggers like this: